Buddha Has to Be Dated to 1800 BC

One of the most important calculations of Indian historyconvert his brother Veetashoka to Buddhism; for doing
has been done on the basis of the lifetime of a certainthis, he enacted a drama. One day, he contrived with
Indian emperor called Ashoka, considered to be one ofhis ministers to get Veetashoka sit on the emperor's
the greatest emperors of world history. He was athrone for a few minutes. He then, as if he was not
Buddhist emperor who was responsible for the spreadaware of the happenings, caught his brother in the act.
of Buddhism, to distant corners of India and theHe then declared that his brother sitting on his throne is
neighboring countries, by sending large number ofan act of treachery and decreed that his brother be
Buddhist missionaries to these places. He builtexecuted. Ashoka, however, gave one week time for
thousands of Buddhist stupas and establishedthe execution and let his brother enjoy all the royal
thousands of Buddhist monasteries all over his empirecomforts for a week, as if he (Veetashoka) were the
that stretched from Iran to Bangladesh and fromemperor. At the end of the week, Ashoka called his
Central Asia (Afghanistan) to South India. A largebrother and asked him if he enjoyed the one week of
number of rocks and pillars, present all over his empire,heavenly comforts of an emperor. Veetashoka told
have been inscribed with his edicts and promulgationshim that the death that was hanging on his head did
to his subjects, written in Magadhi, Sanskrit, Greek, andnot allow him to enjoy the heavenly comforts at all.
Aramic languages. He was initially a cruel king whoAshoka then told him, "if you are oblivious to pleasures
killed a large number of his brothers in order to ascendjust because of one impending death, how do you
the throne. He inherited a large empire and tried toexpect enlightened monks to be happy about
expand it by waging a war against the neighboringcomforts of this life when they have to fear the
kingdom of Kalinga. He won the war, but thedeaths of hundreds of lives in future births?"
gruesome sight of thousands of mutilated dead bodiesVeetashoka was taken by this and converted himself
at the war completely changed his heart. He feltinto a Buddhist monk.
repentant about it, stopped his empire expanding spree,However, the Ashoka of the rock edicts gives us a
and converted to Buddhism after being attracted tocompletely different picture. In one of the edicts, he
the Buddhist principles of non-violence and renunciation.does profess his faith in the Buddha; but that is about it.
We have two sources to thank for much of thisThere is no evidence that he carried out any
information on Ashoka - his rock edicts and Buddhistmissionary activities. None of his rock edicts mention
scriptures (one Indian and two Sri Lankan). Theanything about the teachings of the Buddha. In fact, the
scriptures talk about Ashoka of Mauryan dynasty.Ashoka of rock edicts talks about equality of all
Mainstream historians are not much aware of Ashokareligions! One of the edicts, mentions the following :
of the Gupta dynasty. As per them, there is only one"Beloved-of-the-Gods, King Piyadasi (Ashoka), does
Ashoka - Ashoka of the Mauryan dynasty, as givennot value gifts and honors as much as he values this -
by the Buddhist scriptures. And these Ashoka's rockthat there should be growth in the essentials of all
edicts mention five neighboring Greek and Egyptianreligions. Growth in essentials can be done in different
kings - Antiochos, Ptolemy (second), Antigonos, Magas,ways, but all of them have as their root restraint in
Alexander (second). Since these kings are dated tospeech, that is, not praising one's own religion, or
250-300 BC, this has been the date arrived forcondemning the religion of others without good cause.
Ashoka (Mauryan). As per the Buddhist scriptures,And if there is cause for criticism, it should be done in a
Ashoka (Mauryan) was crowned two hundred andmild way. But it is better to honor other religions for this
eighteen years after the demise of the Buddha. Thisreason. By so doing, one's own religion benefits, and so
would mean that Buddha's date is roughly 500 BC.do other religions, while doing otherwise harms one's
And this date tallies perfectly with the date of 500 BCown religion and the religions of others. Whoever
they arrived through the Aryan Invasion methodology.praises his own religion, due to excessive devotion, and
The calculations seem completely perfect and prettycondemns others with the thought "Let me glorify my
straight forward, and mainstream historians haveown religion," only harms his own religion. Therefore
accepted these calculations completely for the lastcontact (between religions) is good. One should listen
two hundred years.to and respect the doctrines professed by others.
The most troubling aspect with these date calculationsBeloved-of-the-Gods, King Piyadasi (Ashoka), desires
is that there are two Chandragupts and two Ashokasthat all should be well-learned in the good doctrines of
in Indian history. And as per the writings of Greekother religions. Those who are content with their own
traveler Megasthenes, the Gupta dynasty was rulingreligion should be told this: Beloved-of-the-Gods, King
India at about 300 BC. And these writings ofPiyadasi (Ashoka), does not value gifts and honors as
Megashtenes tally with the Puranic calculations as well.much as he values that there should be growth in the
And Indian history does not talk about twoessentials of all religions. And to this end many are
Chandragupts or two Ashokas ruling India at the sameworking - Dhamma Mahamatras, Mahamatras in
time. While traditional Indian and Greek sources talkcharge of the women's quarters, officers in charge of
about Ashoka of Gupta dynasty ruling India at aboutoutlying areas, and other such officers. And the fruit of
300 BC, mainstream historians have arrived at thethis is that one's own religion grows and the Dhamma
conclusion that Ashoka of Mauryan dynasty was rulingis illuminated also."
India at around 300 BC. So we either have to discardUnable to explain these dichotomies, some mainstream
the writings of Megashtenes as well as Puranichistorians have dismissed the Buddhist scriptures as
sources completely, or we have to see if mainstreamunreliable; they go purely by the rock edicts to get a
historians have got the date of Ashoka wrong.picture of Ashokan personality, while they rely on the
Several mainstream historians are not aware of thisBuddhist scriptures for historical aspects. We can see
controversy. Even if they are aware, they dismissas to how selective they have been about the whole
Megasthenes as an unreliable writer and dismiss theAshokan episode - they have dismissed Megasthenes
Indian scriptures as pure mythology. They even easilyas a liar, they have dismissed the Indian scriptures as
shrug away the fact that other Greek accounts at thepure mythology, they have shrugged off other Greek
time of Megasthenes do not talk much about thewritings, and they finally have dismissed even the
presence of Buddhism in India. And almost all theBuddhist scriptures! I think that they have a whole lot of
mainstream historians are blissfully unaware of theanswering to do about the Ashokan episode, even if
presence of two Ashokas in Indian history. A handfulthey seem to currently think that their calculations are
of Indian historians are aware of this puzzle; they haveperfect.
suggested that the Ashoka of the Buddhist sourcesI think the whole confusion has arisen because there
belongs to Gupta dynasty and he ruled India aroundare two emperor Ashokas, and both are Buddhists!
300 BC. However, the Buddhist scriptures clearly talkThe Ashoka of Buddhist scriptures belongs to the
about the emperor Ashoka to be belonging to theMauryan dynasty of 1500 BC. He was a compulsive
Mauryan dynasty, completely negate the arguments ofindividual, devout in his faith, and took steps to spread
the few handful Indian historians who try to wriggle outhis religion far and wide by sending missionaries and
of the conundrum. This has been the biggest puzzleconstructing Buddhist monasteries and stupas.
that has been haunting Indian historical calculations forHowever, he had nothing to do with the edicts and the
more than a century, almost like a Sherlock HolmesKalinga war. The Buddhist scriptures are talking about
and Hercules Poirot mystery.Ashoka the Mauryan. The scriptures mostly talk about
Does this mean that the mainstream historians areparts within India - Kashmir, Maharahtra, Mysore,
completely happy and are not at all puzzled by theirHimalayas, Western India. Buddhism was not yet
calculations? The answer is, surprisingly, no; they arespread in India by his time - so the scriptures are
still quite puzzled over the most important things.clearly talking of the spread of Buddhism within India
The rock edicts of Ashoka mention that Ashokaunder Mauryan emperor Ashoka.
converted to Buddhism because of the remorse heThe Ashoka of the edicts belongs to the Gupta
felt on account of Kalinga war. However, both thedynasty of 300 BC. He was the one who was
Indian as well as the Sri Lankan Buddhist scripturesinvolved in Kalinga war. He felt remorseful and later
differ with this; these scriptures do not talk anythingconverted to Buddhism. However, by his time,
about Kalinga war! They talk about Ashoka beingBuddhism was already spread far and wide and there
converted by the serene teachings of a certain novicewas no need for him to send missionaries. Moreover,
Buddhist monk Samudra/Nyagrodha15.by his time, Buddhism was reeling under the onslaught
Why are Buddhist scriptures silent about Kalinga war?of Sankarcharya and the Vedic religion was making a
While scriptures talk about 84,000 monasteriescomeback. As we shall see a little later in this
established by Ashoka, the edicts are silent on this;discussion, Buddhism was in a confused state about its
they do not mention any Buddhism related activities byideology because of the theological attack launched by
Ashoka. The Buddhist scriptures talk about AshokanSankaracharya. Buddhism was in a transition stage
missionary activities to Kashmir, Maharahtra, Sri Lanka,and it did not give much scope for missionary activities.
Burma, Thailand, Mysore, Himalayas, Western India, andSo, Ashoka the Gupta was not hawkish about his
Greek country. However, the edicts talk about medicalreligion, but was much more tolerant of all religions. And
help to his neighboring kingdoms; they talk about thethe places mentioned in his edicts are mostly his
names of the kings and dynasties around his empireneighboring kingdoms - the edicts are not talking about
including Choda, Pandya, Satiyaputra, Kerala, Sri Lanka,places within India. The places mentioned in the edicts
and five Greek kingdoms. The scriptures do not talkare Choda, Pandya, Satiyaputra, Kerala, and Sri Lanka
about officials called Dharma Mahamatras in hison the south of his empire in South India, and five
kingdom, as professed by the edicts. There areGreek kingdoms to the northwest of his empire. The
several other discrepancies as well in the basic detailsplaces mentioned are clearly not talking about spread
of his life.of Buddhism within India.
The Ashoka of Buddhist scriptures is an exceptionallyThe two Ashokas are completely different. The
devout individual who used to fall prostrate at the feetconfusion has arisen because both are Buddhists; so
of even the lay Buddhist monks. He was desperate toboth the stupas and the edicts are being attributed to
be known as the greatest of all donors to the faith ofone and the same person. If we consider that the
the Buddha. Indian scripture mentions that, at the endedicts belong to one emperor while the stupas and
of his life, he donated almost everything he had tomonasteries belong to another, the riddle is solved. The
Buddhist monasteries. He was someone who wantedtwo Ashokas have been merged into one by
to ensure that Buddhism spread all across the globe. Inhistorians.
Bengal, one follower of Mahavira drew a pictureSo if we arrive at the date of 1500 BC for the
showing Buddha bowing at the feet of Mahavira.Buddhist Mauryan emperor Ashoka, as per the
Ashoka came to know about this and ordered that allBuddhist scriptures, we can easily arrive at the date of
Mahavira followers at that place be executed - 1800the Buddha. Buddha precedes Ashoka by two
of them were slain in a single day! He decreed in ahundred and eighteen years. So this would put Buddha
similar manner on another occasion, promising gold toat anywhere between 1700 BC and 1800 BC. This
those who brought slain heads of non-Buddhists! Androughly tallies with the Puranic calculations as well,
Ashoka went out of his way to convert people intowhich put Buddha's date to around 1800-1900 BC.
Buddhism as some legends show. He wanted to