Buddhism in Contemporary Thailand

eginning of a separation in the period of modernizationareas and the intellectuals, identified themselves with
Buddhism in Thailand reached the modern period underWestern thought and culture. In doing this, they
warm support of the king and the people, without thegradually isolated themselves from the traditional Thai
interruption of colonial persecution or suppression. Sidesociety, a term which was usually used to refer to the
by side with the people, the monks came intobackward rural areas and the uneducated or the
encounter with Western civilization. Hand in hand withold-fashioned. One who tried not to be isolated
the secular government the monkhood started onsometimes found himself a man of twin personalities: a
modernization. Under King Chulalongkorn (Rama V;traditional Thai and a Westernized modern Thai. For
2411-53/1868-1910) the structure of the secularthese people Buddhist institutions were associated with
government was changed to adopt a new patternthe traditional Thai society or, at least, the traditional
and a modern Western system of public educationpersonality, and Buddhism was identified with traditional
was introduced. With the assistance of thecultural activities. Thus, Buddhism made itself accessible
King’s half-brother, the Monk-princeonly to one part or one half of Thai society, the less
Vajirananฺa-Varorasa, who later became aprivileged and waning half. Buddhism and the modern
supreme patriarch, an important role in public educationThai society gradually isolated themselves from each
was assigned to the monks, a new form ofother. Thai Buddhism has put itself in a more and more
ecclesiastical government was established, and anarrowed confinement. The monkhood finds no place
foundation was laid for the modernization ofin the intelligentsia except for a few individual monks.
ecclesiastical set of the Pali Canon, known as theThey have lost intellectual leadership or leadership in
Royal Siamese Tripitฺaka. A royal library wasthe modernized sector of Thai society. Under the
erected for the preservation of Buddhist sacred booksmodern Westernized system of education, Thai youth
and rare scriptures. Two royal Buddhist academies,have to a large extent been alienated from Buddhism
Mahamakut and Mahachulalongkorn, were foundedand also, to a lesser extent, from traditional Thai
with a plan to function in due course as Sanghaculture. Thailand’s modern system of education
colleges or universities providing for monks andis sometimes accused of being education for
novices advanced Buddhist studies along with modernWesternization or education for alienation of Thai
higher education.youth.
With the end of the reign of King. Chulalongkorn, thingsTo the traditional Thai society and to the traditional
changed for the worse. The process of modernizationpersonality of a modern Thai, Buddhism usually takes
continued on the part of the secular sector, but on thethe form of merit-making acts and Buddhist festivals
ecclesiastical side it was kept going for only a shortand ceremonies. To the old-fashioned or the more
period of time and then waned. The monkhood wastraditional, this usually extends to include the faithful
put in a losing position. Monks were retired from theirobservance of some basic rules of morality. Few of
role in public education, though most of the publicthe later traditional Buddhists, however, have intellectual
schools were still housed in monastery compoundsknowledge of the Buddha’s teachings or care
and the monks still collected donations for the buildingto learn about them. The majority of them are given to
of these schools. Preliminary arrangements for moderncelebrations and temple fairs and festivals. Superstition
higher Buddhist education were set aside and the plansand astrology still play an important part in their lives,
were not undertaken. Without open suppression, thereboth individual and social. Monks themselves for the
was no urge to activity. The monks fell into inactivitymost part focus their attention only on monastic affairs
and became attached to traditionalism. Being deprivedinside the Wat and place emphasis on the construction
of their deserved responsibility, they becameof monastic buildings. They are usually seen blessing
underemployed and many developed the habit ofreligious ceremonies by chanting or ceremonial
idleness, living only on the rich inheritance of traditionalpreaching and inducing the adherents to make
popular support.donations for a monastic building. Optimistically,
A WIDENING GAP BETWEEN THE TRADITIONALhowever, in rural areas, social leadership of the monks
SANGHA AND THE MODERN INTELLECTUALSis still maintained. Monasteries remain, to a large extent,
For the Thai public, an encounter with the West did notcentres of social life of the communities. Monks still
mean a reaction against it, as in the countries thatplay traditional roles helping people towards their
were once under colonial rule. But, on the contrary, itwell-being, both spiritual and temporal. The monkhood
meant an eagerness to learn and to imitate. Strongstill serves the society as a main source of social
nationalism, with which Buddhism as a national culturalmobility and provides much for the lessening of the
heritage is usually identified, also has not been widelyunequality of opportunity in education. But, unfortunately,
developed and cannot be relied upon as a wall againstthese roles are rarely played on a conscious level and
Western secularism. People who first found access tothere is a fear of losing them.
modern technology of the West, usually those in urban