Did the Buddha Perform Miracles?

The later phases of Buddhism, described asquestion whether an unusual intelligence disciplined by
Mahâyâna, show this feature among manymeditation might not attain to such knowledge.
others, that the supernatural and mythological side ofStill, though the essence of the doctrine may be
religion becomes prominent. Gods or angels play andetachable from miracles and even be scientific, one
increasingly important part, the Buddha himselfcannot read very far in the Vinaya or the Sutta Pitaka
becomes a being superior to all gods, and Buddhas,without coming upon unearthly beings or supernatural
gods and saints perform at every turn feats for whichoccurrences.
miracle seems too modest a name.The credibility of miracles is to my mind simply a
It may be fairly said that Buddhism is not a miraculousquestion of evidence. Any extraordinary event, such
religion in the sense that none of its essential doctrinesas a person doing a thing totally foreign to his
depend on miracles. It would seem that such a religioncharacter, is improbable a priori. But the law does not
as Mormonism must collapse if it were admitted thatallow that the best of men is incapable of committing
the Book of Mormon is not a revelation delivered tothe worst of crimes, if the evidence proves he did. Nor
Joseph Smith. But the content of the Buddha'scan the most extraordinary violation of nature's laws
teaching is not miraculous and, though he is alleged tobe pronounced impossible if supported by sufficient
have possessed insight exceeding ordinary humanevidence, only the evidence must be strong in
knowledge, yet this is not exactly a miracle and it is aproportion to the strangeness of the circumstances.