Different Social Structures to Bring Balance in the Multi-cultural and Multi-ethnic Country

Many of developed countries are multi-cultural andrice, plain flour, potatoes and tacos. Given the food
multi-ethnic. For example, US is multi-cultural anddistribution system, everyone in those countries can
multi-ethnic. The complexity often creates number ofget whatever he/she wants. If he is a Muslim and
social problems, so US has decided to separatedoes not eat pork, then he can get beef, chicken and
church and state since the founding of the country.fish. If he is a vegetarian, then he can get all
The country has made its complexity one of itsvegetables that he wants. This is not exactly how the
appeals, and the separation of church and state hasfood distribution system is structured in India; the food
worked well for the country over all. Many otherdistribution system generally limits its supplies in terms
developed countries, in particular, many westernof variety so that it serves everyone. Hindus do not
European countries such as UK, France and Holland,eat beef and Muslims do not eat pork; as a result,
are also multi-cultural and multi-ethnic today as a resultbutcher shops in India generally sell only chicken, mutton
of immigrants' settling in those countries; they areand fish; this creates no conflict. Also most Indians eat
essentially adapting the same approach as US in ordervegetables primarily; roughly 60% of Indians are
to bring balance in their societies. However, this is notvegetarians and they do not even eat eggs.
the only model of the multi-cultural and multi-ethnicMany developed countries around the world promote
country, nor is it the oldest model. India is actuallythe idea that any two people ought to be able to get
multi-cultural and multi-ethnic (official languages alonemarried; inter-racial marriages are becoming very
count more than twenty two languages, and a numbercommon. However, marriage in India is not quite like
of different religions are practiced including Hinduism,that. Even today, it is very common that family
Islam, Sikhism, Christianity and Buddhism); India hasmembers arrange marriages. Two people, a bride and
developed and maintained its multi-cultural anda groom meet just once or twice after their family
multi-ethnic environment a little differently. When wemembers make the arrangement, and they decide to
look at three major functions of the society, the foodget married; something like this is very common.
distribution, marriage and the judicial system, we findReligions and social classes play very important roles in
that developed countries' approach and India'smarriage, and two people of the same religion get
approach are very different.married commonly. Marriage is to preserve the existing
We need to eat to live; therefore, the food distributionsocial structure to a large extent.
is a major function of the society and it is developedDeveloped countries generally believe in the separation
to accommodate everyone in the society. In cases ofof church and state, and they define laws accordingly.
multi-cultural and multi-ethnic developed countries, theyIn principle, laws should not reflect religious beliefs or
supply all kinds of food that they can physically supply.practices. This is not the case in India. India has Indian
They supply all kinds of meat including beef, pork,Civic Law and each religion has its specific laws; there
chicken and fish. They also supply all kinds ofare separate laws governing Hindus, Muslims,
vegetables and fruits. They also supply bread, pasta,Christians, Sikhs and other religions.