The Idea of the Internet Homogenizing Culture

-- End Ad Box --->it’s hard to conclude whether the overall effect
The issue concerning whether the Internet plays aof the Internet is homogenizing. However, it can be
pivotal role in globalization is a highly contentious andclearly stated that the Internet does marginalize those
debatable topic. Globalization, often defined as “thewho are unable to use this medium.
integration of economic capital markets and cultureAs usage of the Internet becomes more popular, the
throughout the world” is seen as a concept that hasdebate of homogenizing culture is fiercely debated.
both negative as well as positive benefits. The rate ofSome academics argue that because the Internet
growth in the globalization of nations and geographicalbenefits the rich and the educated, those who are able
regions is seen to be heavily assisted by the speed ofto use the Internet usually have a level of mental
information knowledge that the Internet provides.capability, thus, the homogenizing of culture is only
However, although in theory, the sharing of knowledgeapplicable to a limited extent. For example, the Bengali
is supposedly to be beneficial towards thetribes in Bangladesh practice sustainable living and do
development of humanity, the Internet also provides anot value the knowledge that is presented on the
pathway to homogenizing culture and creating anInternet. They view the Internet as a very negative
unequal playing field for developing nations. Thisform of communication, as personal contact is not
argument can be clearly seen in case studies of Asianmade. Members of the Bengali tribe live by the Hindu
nations, especially in Thailand. Hence, the use ofreligion and everyone in the tribe has a certain role.
Internet and the growth of businesses on the InternetThus, the tribe as a whole is self-sufficient and
have increased, the question raised is that althoughmembers do not feel the need to adopt the values
technology has advanced communication andand the ‘teachings’ of the Internet.
knowledge, has this benefit affected people living inFurthermore, indigenous Tibetans are another example
developing countries, or has the gap between the richwhere the knowledge of the Internet does not reach
and the poor widened?the people. Due to their belief of the Buddhist teaching
The Internet is a unique form of media. It has theof the Livelihood, they believe in living in harmony with
power to reach many but this is affected by factorstheir surrounding land. Members of these indigenous
such as financial status, technological skill, knowledge,communities do not believe in the Internet as they
and the desire for the medium. The Internet is notwould argue that the computer is a want and not a
necessarily appropriate or possible for everyone toneed. Hence, in considering the issue of whether the
have, and in a country like Thailand, it can be clearlyInternet is a tool for the homogenization of culture,
seen that the less fortunate have been marginalized,although some would say ‘yes’ due to
especially the uneducated and those from rural areas.developing Asian nations becoming westernized due to
For example, seventy percent of Thailand’spropaganda on the Internet, others would argue that
Internet users are concentrated in The Bangkokonly Asian communities that have already been
Metropolitan Area (Hongladaron, 2003) and only four towesternized use the Internet. These academics would
five percent of Rural Thailand has access to theargue that some Asian communities, especially those in
Internet. In a few of his articles the scholarindigenous tribal communities, would not use the
Hongladaron has also discussed the marginalization ofInternet because of their cultural paradigm, hence the
rural Thai citizens. Hongladaron states the benefits ofInternet community is already focused on just one
the Internet, but then confirms from his research thatgroup of culture with one group of people sharing a
because these benefits are only accessible by thecommon belief: ‘that the Internet is a useful
wealthy, hence, due to the poor being marginalized, thetool’.
Internet can be considered to be a discriminatory formFinally, it is not disputed that the Internet is a place of
of medium. However, Hongladaron also argues that‘information sharing’ and this sharing of
the Internet does not homogenize cultures. He statesknowledge could lead to certain ideologies being more
that “the relation between computer-mediatedprominent and change the thoughts and practices of
communication technologies and local cultures isother cultures. However, many would argue that
characterized neither by a homogenizing effect, not byalthough this is inevitable on the Internet, the Internet
an erecting of barriers separating one culture fromcannot control the lifestyle of a person’s life and
another.” (Hongladaron, 1998). Hongladaron came tobeliefs, thus the Internet can only present another
a conclusion about the Internet homogenizing culture,person’s discourse, but cannot force a
but only to a limited extent. With limited informationperson’s ideology to change.
being available on the ways that Thai people interactBibliography and References Used:
on the Internet, or view the Internet as a medium,Cooper Wesley 2004.