The Politicization of Vietnamese Buddhism and a New Crisis

onks wanted for the monkhood and Buddhism thedraw up a constitution, (2) national elections, and (3) the
power that they saw the Catholic Church and thereturn to his post of General Thi, a military leader
Catholics have under Ngo Dinh Diem. They wanted topopular among his men and the Buddhists, who had
place their chosen Buddhist political laymen in thebeen dismissed from his position in Hue. This led to the
government, to be advisers to the government, and toBuddhist crisis which lasted until September 1966. In the
gain more state patronage for Buddhism. Then theyprocess, the Buddhist movement was seriously divided
took more direct political action. With their social andbetween the moderates who sought to compromise
political activities increasing through Buddhistand the militants who even turned their demands into a
organizations, they became more powerful andcampaign to overthrow the Ky regime. In their internal
directed influence toward the government. They alsostruggle, it was the militants who defeated the
developed tensions and even clashed with themoderates and dominated the actions of the Unified
Catholics who were afraid of being treated with theBuddhist Church.
kind of religious discrimination that the Buddhists saidThe militant Buddhist students and thousands of
they had suffered under the regime of Diem. Whensoldiers in Hue and Danang followed the militant monks
Nguyen Cao Ky established his military regime in Juneand brought the two cities to a point on the verge of
2508/1965, there had taken place four more changesrebellion. Violent protests were also held in Saigon. The
of South Vietnamese governments and the Buddhistsgovernment used force to put down the uprisings. As
were said to have been directly or indirectlyin the crisis of 1963, the Buddhists used demonstrations,
responsible for the downfall of these governments.hunger strikes and self-immolation as their weapons.
In the early period of the Ky regime, the monks’But, this time, even their ultimate weapon of burning
overt political activities decreased due to unfavourablethemselves to death did not excite the people and win
military and political conditions. Moreover, the splitpopular acceptance so much as in the former crisis.
widened between the militant and the moderateThe monks did not have a just cause. It was not a
monks. Under the urging of the lay Buddhists forreligious struggle to save the Buddhist Church, but a
political moderation and the building of internal strength,false cry without clarity of purpose. This time, it was
main efforts were directed towards more positivenot Ky but the militant Buddhists who were defeated.
activities, especially Buddhist education, social welfareHue and Danang were brought under government
and youth programmes. Three weekly newspapers,control and Ky had no need to resign.
three monthly magazines and twenty-five periodicalsHowever, though the Buddhists failed to remove Ky
were published to achieve propagative aims.from power, lost the effectiveness and credibility of
Then, in March 2509/1966, the Buddhists came againtheir leadership, and became weakened through their
into conflict with the government. The Unified Buddhistinternal dissension, their efforts were notaltogether
Church wanted to establish a position of power in thefutile. Following pressure from them, the government
new government and brought political pressure onwas forced to hold elections for a national constituent
Premier Nguyen Cao Ky. They issued a communiqueassembly in September 2509/1966.
on March 14, calling for (1) an immediate convention to